<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FSN: Forensic Science News &#187; Courtroom Anecdotes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/category/courtanecdotes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes</link>
	<description>and Opinion by a Real Forensic Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Case Story :  Aim High</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/military-criminal-defense-attorney-aim-high-us-serviceman-shooting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/military-criminal-defense-attorney-aim-high-us-serviceman-shooting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Anecdotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Anecdotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballistics expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal defense attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting reconstruction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Military criminal defense attorneys contacted me to aide in the defense of a US serviceman who was charged with committing a drive-by shooting.  I reviewed the case material, and said I didn’t think I would be able to help much, because the evidence I needed to examine had been destroyed when the <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/military-criminal-defense-attorney-aim-high-us-serviceman-shooting/">[Continue Reading Case Story :  Aim High...]</a></b></i></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/military-criminal-defense-attorney-aim-high-us-serviceman-shooting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Melendez-Diaz</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/more-on-melendez-diaz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/more-on-melendez-diaz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Anecdotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert testimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melendez-diaz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>The following article can be viewed in full here.</p>
<p>The article opens up with this statement:</p>
<p>Get ready to trade your lab coat for a suit coat. A U.S. Supreme Court ruling last Thursday will require crime lab analysts to appear in court and submit to cross-examination if their reports are entered into evidence. This <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/more-on-melendez-diaz/">[Continue Reading More on Melendez-Diaz...]</a></b></i></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/more-on-melendez-diaz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. MASSACHUSETTS</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/melendez-diaz-v-massachusetts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/melendez-diaz-v-massachusetts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Anecdotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melendez-diaz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>digg_url = 'http://digg.com/general_sciences/MELENDEZ_DIAZ_v_MASSACHUSETTS';
The recent Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decision in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts has sent a shockwave through the forensic science community in the United States.</p>
<p>In a community comment forum for forensic scientists, there was a comment from an analyst from another country, that stated they didn’t see what the <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/melendez-diaz-v-massachusetts/">[Continue Reading MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. MASSACHUSETTS...]</a></b></i></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/melendez-diaz-v-massachusetts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazing Defensive Technique</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/amazing-defensive-technique/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/amazing-defensive-technique/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Anecdotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>I was recently required to come testify on an old case I worked for a local police department a number of years ago.  The actual work I performed was hardly a “case breaker”.</p>
<p>I simply looked at casings and projectiles recovered by police and inter-compared them, so see if they were fired from <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/amazing-defensive-technique/">[Continue Reading Amazing Defensive Technique...]</a></b></i></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/amazing-defensive-technique/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Casefile: Aim High</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/casefile-aim-high/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/casefile-aim-high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Anecdotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>digg_url = 'http://digg.com/general_sciences/Casefile_Aim_High#';
Good forensic scientists are supposed to be impartial.  Their job is to simply explain to a jury what the physical evidence means in a case.  Forensic scientists don’t have a horse in the race, so to speak.  Regardless of which side calls them for testimony, some forensic testimony <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/casefile-aim-high/">[Continue Reading Casefile: Aim High...]</a></b></i></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/casefile-aim-high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CSI Episode Reviews Delay</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/csi-episode-reviews-delay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/csi-episode-reviews-delay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 02:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSI: Gag Relfex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Anecdotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>As many of you have noticed and informed me, I am running a bit behind on my CSI Episode reviews.  I have all the episodes DVR’d, but my work schedule has me out of state 3 out of 4 weeks recently.  I will do my best to catch up starting next <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/csi-episode-reviews-delay/">[Continue Reading CSI Episode Reviews Delay...]</a></b></i></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/csi-episode-reviews-delay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientific Forensicists</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/scientific-forensicists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/scientific-forensicists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Anecdotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Forensicists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>digg_url = 'http://digg.com/general_sciences/Scientific_Forensicists';</p>
Note: There is a rating embedded within this post, please visit this post to rate it.
<p>I have a hard time believing what some attorneys testify to during trials.  Well, I guess they aren’t officially testifying, but they are stating their opinion on the matter, and end their pontification with a <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/scientific-forensicists/">[Continue Reading Scientific Forensicists...]</a></b></i></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/scientific-forensicists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mesa PD 0.00 BAC DUI Arrest?</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/mesa-pd-retaliatory-dui-arrest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/mesa-pd-retaliatory-dui-arrest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Anecdotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Note: There is a rating embedded within this post, please visit this post to rate it.
Originally posted in New Times here:</p>
<p>I heard about this arrest right after it had happened.  Mr. Squires was worried he would need my assistance looking over the laboratory data in case it came back with ANY alcohol <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/mesa-pd-retaliatory-dui-arrest/">[Continue Reading Mesa PD 0.00 BAC DUI Arrest?...]</a></b></i></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/mesa-pd-retaliatory-dui-arrest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The subpoena…</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/the-subpoena/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/the-subpoena/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Anecdotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Note: There is a rating embedded within this post, please visit this post to rate it.
As a witness for trials, sometimes you can be served with a subpoena.  Subpoenas are official court documents, usually signed by a judge, ordering you to appear at a courtroom at a certain date and time.  <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/the-subpoena/">[Continue Reading The subpoena…...]</a></b></i></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/the-subpoena/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courtroom Waiting…</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/courtroom-waiting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/courtroom-waiting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Anecdotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Note: There is a rating embedded within this post, please visit this post to rate it.
Here is an old “rant” I posted years ago about the waiting one does for court cases.  At the end of the post I’ll add updated comments and perspectives now that I’m a private consultant, and no <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/courtroom-waiting/">[Continue Reading Courtroom Waiting…...]</a></b></i></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/courtroom-waiting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to Bench Notes…</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/welcome-to-bench-notes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/welcome-to-bench-notes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courtroom Anecdotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Welcome to Bench Notes.  This is a blog that will hopefully highlight some funny court anecdotes, and give readers an inside look at forensic science.</p>
<p>The other day I was testifying in a firearms related case.  I had been retained by the defense, but neither side was arguing the firearms related evidence. <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/welcome-to-bench-notes/">[Continue Reading Welcome to Bench Notes…...]</a></b></i></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/welcome-to-bench-notes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
