[ratings]
What happened here? Did they hire special guest writers? Where was the rare species DNA used to crack the case? It broke with the established pattern — refreshingly.
The entire concept for the episode was brilliant. Bad guy who claims he’s innocent takes hostages and forces a CSI to “prove” his innocence. The ONLY forensic bit was that crazy was the the portable CT scanner to perform the virtual autopsy that was delivered in under 2 hours. Well that and the fact our resident animal DNA expert/computer virtual basic IP trace hacker is ALSO a latent print expert. But then I guess Detective Monroe is a forensic superwoman. At least the other CSI flavors generally keep people experts in just a couple of fields. But we can over look that bit due to the overall greatness of this episode.
But seriously, if this episode is more on par with the writing of a CSI NY episode I’ll have to give it a second chance. And tell my wife she threw in the towel too early on this series. Excellent use of forensics, well planned out plot twists, and skilled enough writing to keep a story progressing only using one main shooting location. This was the opposite of the CSI Miami effect, where they are jumping around so much they have to use split screens to show you what minor detail is playing out at four different locations all at the same time.
The whole episode makes me want to watch Inside Man all over again.
So in summary, great episode, excellent writing, brilliant use of forensics — fire the guy(s) who wrote the Cabbie Killer story arc. Heck even the name “Cabbie Killer” seems awful.
No related posts.