Welcome back Mac and gang!
This episode wins the award for the most and biggest forensic “b@llsh*t” moments to date in a single episode. The whole CSI NY series has had the highest density of with these moments compared to Las Vegas and Miami, but this episode topped everything I’ve seen.
The cliff-hanger is over. We get to see what happens to the kidnapped Mac. Well, sort of.
Picking up where “Hostage” left off with a little extra unnecessary drama, “Vertias” starts with Mac walking out of a river after pulling himself from a submerged car, not remembering how he got there. So of course it’s up to the CSIs to not only catch the bad guy, but figure out what happened to Mac in the aftermath of the bank heist.
There were still some unclear aspects of the episode for me. Hopefully someone can explain it to me. Why did Lauren (the bank-teller) say she needed to borrow Samantha’s car if she had an SUV to drive, and how did the bad-guy get the red car?
On to the forensic aspects of the show…
1) The bullet recovered from inside Mac’s shirt. So here is the shocking theory Lindsay offered to explanation how Mac got shot without piercing his skin. A possible under-powered cartridge was fired through the passenger side window, slowing down the bullet. The bullet then hit the “elastic” fibers in Mac’s shirt, further slowing momentum so the end result was the bullet didn’t break his skin. Mac was saved by his shirt!
Amazing B.S. First of all a projectile that perforates passenger side glass like on the SUV would cause the whole window to fracture. Ever caused tempered glass to fracture? If you make a hole in it, the whole sheet fractures nearly instantly. What they showed for a bullet hole in glass would only happen in laminated glass, like the windshield of a car.
On top of that, it would have minimal effect in slowing down the projectile. And Lindsay’s idea that an elastic shirt would save Mac from the bullet is crazy too. I hope we don’t see people go out and buy spandex thinking they are now bullet proof…not just because they wouldn’t be, but because most people shouldn’t wear spandex.
2) I’ll let the whole “we can take 3-D photographs in the field so we don’t have to do castings of tire tracks” thing slide. Based on the wheel base, the CSIs narrow the list of possible car candidates down to three models — OK, fine.
Where it gets silly is based on the depth of the tire track impressions (without knowing the precise make and model, vehicle weight, or considering soil density conditions), CSI Adam deduces the tracks aren’t deep enough for the money to be in the car.
That’s simply incredible!
3) Remember from my CSI Miami # 701 “Resurrection” episode review where I said at least they didn’t try to blow up some digital photo beyond what is reasonable? Well no worries folks, they saved this bit of digital magic for this episode.
So at a toll booth, the bad-guy opens the car door to pick up his dropped money. Well CSI Adam blows up the surveillance photographs from the toll booth to the point where he can clearly read the tiny VIN number on the inside of the car door, identifying the stolen car.
I had to pause my DVR until I was done laughing. After I wiped my tears away they quickly topped that one though…
4) Remember the amazing exotic bird fecal database, and primate DNA database from the end of last season? They went one further.
The bad-guy left a crucial bit of evidence when he kicked Mac’s CSI kit back at the bank. His shoe transferred a mixture of soil and plant material containing traces of wood. From the soil mix Lindsay not only identifies the plant, but quickly determines the wood traces came from 1930s era rail ties, leading Mac and Stella to the precise 10,000 sq. ft. lot in New York City that the bad-guy recently walked thru burying his stash of passports and licenses.
What?
Identifying the plant is one thing. The fact the crime lab knows the precise location of every type of plant that grows near rail tracks in all of New York City is a bit to much for even the most devout couch-potato to swallow without a little gagging.
All in all it was a great episode. But I seem to like the CSI franchise for different reasons than other people. My dad has been a fan of crime drama for years, whereas I’m like most real CSIs who enjoy the comical antics of our TV counterparts that are very loosely based on real science.