No related posts.

CSI:TV crime labs aren’t realistic


Regular read­ers have heard me go on about this topic before, but here is another arti­cle about the dif­fer­ences between real CSI work, and the TV version.

Original arti­cle posted here.

CSI:TV crime labs aren’t real­is­tic; many foren­sic sci­en­tists may never visit crime scene, and tests can take weeks to com­plete
Nov 11, 2008, 1:11 PM
By ANDREA BARTLOW
WARRENSBURG, Mo.- On TV shows like “CSI: Crime Scene Investigation,” foren­sic sci­en­tists are made to look like super-cops who find the crime scene, col­lect and process the evi­dence, inter­ro­gate sus­pects and solve the case, all in less than an hour.

In real­ity, crim­i­nal sci­ence is much more spe­cial­ized and there are foren­sic sci­en­tists who never have to set foot on a crime scene.

Martin Lindenbusch, Central alum­nus and Missouri State Highway Patrol Crime Laboratory tox­i­col­o­gist, dis­pelled many myths about foren­sic sci­ence and how evi­dence is really han­dled and processed at crime labs dur­ing a cam­pus pre­sen­ta­tion Saturday.

Lindenbusch said one of the most wide­spread mis­con­cep­tions about crime labs and foren­sics is how long it takes to per­form the tests and get their results back.

“We get lots of blood-alcohol con­tent tests and the test itself only takes four min­utes,” he said. “However, there is prior instru­ment prepa­ra­tion, paper­work that has to be done before and after the pro­ce­dures and the tests are done in large batches.”

Tests can take weeks

Lindenbusch explained that 50–60 tests are usu­ally processed at once, which is more effi­cient and time and cost-effective, with each batch tak­ing 2 to 3 weeks to process. Some crime labs can fall behind as much as 8 months to a year, said Lindenbusch, because of a lack of equip­ment or capa­ble scientists.

“We’ll spend all day or a few days get­ting the sam­ples to be tested ready, then a few more days pro­cess­ing them,” Lindenbusch said. “Then we go back and match the sam­ples and their results to the cases. Our lab is only about a month or so behind, which is good as a crime lab can hope to be at.”

And that’s just the screen­ing phase of the drug and chem­i­cal tests; if more spe­cific, or “con­fir­ma­tory” tests are required, the process takes even longer.

The tox­i­col­ogy depart­ment per­forms tests to detect traces of metham­phet­a­mine, mar­i­juana, seda­tives, cocaine, hero­ine, opi­ates and many other chem­i­cals on the sam­ples of blood, urine and other body flu­ids they receive from the police.

They use foren­sic tech­niques includ­ing the AxSYM System, which mea­sures flu­o­res­cent polar­iza­tion of chem­i­cals and sub­stances. Also employed are gas chro­matog­ra­phy and mass spec­trom­e­try, which iden­tify chem­i­cals by their mol­e­c­u­lar structure.

Highly spe­cial­ized field

Because of tech­no­log­i­cal advances in foren­sic sci­ence and crim­i­nol­ogy, sci­en­tists can be spe­cial­ists as opposed to gen­er­al­ists, who Lindenbusch explained were more com­mon 20 to 30 years ago.

“Generalists are like the detec­tives on TV, who are involved in many or all aspects of the inves­ti­ga­tion,” Lindenbusch said. “Now, the fields have expanded so that each sci­en­tist can con­cen­trate on one aspect of foren­sics and really specialize.”

Lindenbusch grad­u­ated from Central in 1990 as a chem­istry major with a minor in biol­ogy and said he liked the expe­ri­ence of com­ing back to lec­ture as opposed to learn.

“It feels good to come back and show what you can accom­plish, the value of stick­ing to your degree,” he said.

Lindenbusch used actual cases he has worked on to illus­trate the impor­tance of foren­sic sci­ence and the real­ity of how they are processed. In one of those cases, he processed evi­dence from a sex­ual assault case that took place 14 years ago.

Science traps rapist

A male para­medic super­vi­sor sedated a female coworker by dis­solv­ing Valium (diazepam) in a glass of orange juice and when she became uncon­scious, he injected her with Atracurium, a sur­gi­cal anes­thetic. With blood and urine sam­ples from the vic­tim and the glass with the orange juice, Lindenbusch was able to find the chem­i­cals that proved she had been drugged and assaulted.

“I tes­ti­fied in the trial and the man was con­victed for rape and sen­tenced to seven years in prison,” Lindenbusch said. “This case was par­tic­u­larly inter­est­ing because of the types of sam­ples, since most assaults are not pre­med­i­tated. The attacker used chem­i­cals that are not com­monly found.”

The future holds wider strides in foren­sic sci­ence, as the abil­ity to test sam­ples of saliva and hair is expand­ing, said Lindenbusch. Robotics will play a big­ger role in exper­i­men­ta­tion, as machines are cre­ated that can per­form a test on a sam­ple with­out human inter­ac­tion, from begin­ning to end.

“Automatic processes will cut man hours; mak­ing the machines work prop­erly is the trick,” Lindenbusch said. “The objec­tive is to min­i­mize human error and input, as much as possible.”

The Department of Biochemistry, Chemistry and Physics, ACS Student Affiliates, the Society of Physics Students and Sigma Xi spon­sored the annual col­lo­quium titled “The Reality Behind The Hype! CSI Uncovered.”

Share

No related posts.

You must be logged in to post a comment.