<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dallas Crime Lab Next in Long Line of Labs to be Closed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/dallas-crime-lab-next-in-long-line-of-labs-to-be-closed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/dallas-crime-lab-next-in-long-line-of-labs-to-be-closed/</link>
	<description>and Opinion by a Real Forensic Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 01:26:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: More info on the Southwestern Institute of Forensic Sciences &#124; FSN: Forensic Science News</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/dallas-crime-lab-next-in-long-line-of-labs-to-be-closed/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>More info on the Southwestern Institute of Forensic Sciences &#124; FSN: Forensic Science News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=748#comment-263</guid>
		<description>[...] highly of the Southwestern Institute of Forensic Sciences (SWIFS). If you recall, we posted an entry a while back about SWIFS. Briefly an employee was terminated for purportedly not passing training milestones. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] highly of the Southwestern Institute of Forensic Sciences (SWIFS). If you recall, we posted an entry a while back about SWIFS. Briefly an employee was terminated for purportedly not passing training milestones. The […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin J McShane, Esquire</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/dallas-crime-lab-next-in-long-line-of-labs-to-be-closed/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin J McShane, Esquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=748#comment-245</guid>
		<description>With the understanding that these are simply allegations at this point, here is my take for what it is worth.  

1.  These allegations highlight the need for meaningful random, unannounced, spot audits conducted by accredited truly independent third party Quality Assurance and ISO trained/certified Quality Lab Auditors.  Not CLIA, ASCLD or even the state.  
2.  There is a need for meaningful third party method and protocol validation for all tests conducted in a forensic environment before a single result makes it way into Court.  
4.  Additionally, we must insist that all results are reported in a metrologically accepted manner with all sources of error identified and accounted for in an empirical way and reported in a true uncertainty budget.  
5.  We must also insist on meaningful double blind and truly random proficiency based testing monitored by third parties that are above question and reproach not just for the lab in general, but for each and every technician in the lab.  
6.  Everything must be totally transparent, documented and most of all traceable.

This is science.  What happens now in Courts all across the United States is not science.  It is a presentation of science fiction.

For as long as we in America accept the Wizard of Oz hiding behind the curtain of secrecy when it comes to police/Government based forensic science in America, there can be no truly meaningful assurance as the validity of the procedures used, the specificity of the results reported let alone the accuracy and the precision of the expressed opinions/conclusions of the technicians.  

Who disagrees?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the understanding that these are simply allegations at this point, here is my take for what it is worth.  </p>
<p>1.  These allegations highlight the need for meaningful random, unannounced, spot audits conducted by accredited truly independent third party Quality Assurance and ISO trained/certified Quality Lab Auditors.  Not CLIA, ASCLD or even the state.<br />
2.  There is a need for meaningful third party method and protocol validation for all tests conducted in a forensic environment before a single result makes it way into Court.<br />
4.  Additionally, we must insist that all results are reported in a metrologically accepted manner with all sources of error identified and accounted for in an empirical way and reported in a true uncertainty budget.<br />
5.  We must also insist on meaningful double blind and truly random proficiency based testing monitored by third parties that are above question and reproach not just for the lab in general, but for each and every technician in the lab.<br />
6.  Everything must be totally transparent, documented and most of all traceable.</p>
<p>This is science.  What happens now in Courts all across the United States is not science.  It is a presentation of science fiction.</p>
<p>For as long as we in America accept the Wizard of Oz hiding behind the curtain of secrecy when it comes to police/Government based forensic science in America, there can be no truly meaningful assurance as the validity of the procedures used, the specificity of the results reported let alone the accuracy and the precision of the expressed opinions/conclusions of the technicians.  </p>
<p>Who disagrees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/dallas-crime-lab-next-in-long-line-of-labs-to-be-closed/feed/ ) in 0.80885 seconds, on Feb 12th, 2012 at 5:13 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 6:13 am UTC -->
