<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FSN: Forensic Science News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes</link>
	<description>and Opinion by a Real Forensic Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:17:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Crime Labs Should Stop Catering to Police and Prosecutors</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/crime-labs-should-stop-catering-to-police-and-prosecutors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/crime-labs-should-stop-catering-to-police-and-prosecutors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime lab bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas forensics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/crime-labs-should-stop-catering-to-police-and-prosecutors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>I’ve commented many times about the inherent problem with crime labs being a part of, or directly supervised by police or prosecutors.</p>
<p>Below is an article that gives evidence as to why.</p>
<p>But it’s been a long-standing problem in Texas and elsewhere that medical examiners and crime labs tend to see police and prosecutors as <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/crime-labs-should-stop-catering-to-police-and-prosecutors/">[Continue Reading Crime Labs Should Stop Catering to Police and Prosecutors...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/crime-labs-should-stop-catering-to-police-and-prosecutors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ultimate in Concealed Carry</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/ultimate-in-concealed-carry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/ultimate-in-concealed-carry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concealed carry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolver hidden rectum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/ultimate-in-concealed-carry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>In my years as a forensic firearms examiner I’ve seen some crappy firearms, but this one takes the cake.</p>
<p>Cops Believe North Carolina Inmate Hid 10-Inch Revolver In His Rectum. Luckily, It Was Unloaded.</p>
<p>Read the whole story on The Smoking Gun</p>


<p>No <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/ultimate-in-concealed-carry/">[Continue Reading Ultimate in Concealed Carry...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/ultimate-in-concealed-carry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Transportation Safety Board Wants All Cell Phone Use Banned in Cars</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/national-transportation-safety-board-wants-all-cell-phone-use-banned-in-cars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/national-transportation-safety-board-wants-all-cell-phone-use-banned-in-cars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 03:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTSB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/national-transportation-safety-board-wants-all-cell-phone-use-banned-in-cars/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>I called this 7 years ago while working for a police agency. My co-workers laughed at me, thinking I was “crazy”.</p>
<p>Now the official recommendation has come out.</p>
<p>Now the only thing the government needs to figure out is how big of a fine they can get away with.</p>
<p>Expect a big public relations media campaign <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/national-transportation-safety-board-wants-all-cell-phone-use-banned-in-cars/">[Continue Reading National Transportation Safety Board Wants All Cell Phone Use Banned in Cars...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/national-transportation-safety-board-wants-all-cell-phone-use-banned-in-cars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alcohol Impairs Your Judgment</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/alcohol-impairs-your-judgment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/alcohol-impairs-your-judgment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 15:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9 year old driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcohol impairment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drunk driving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/alcohol-impairs-your-judgment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Good — Having a designated driver if you plan on drinking.</p>
<p>Bad — Having your 9 year old be your designated driver.</p>
<p>This guy is facing some serious charges. Thankfully no one was hurt.  Remember, even at low levels, some people’s judgment can be impaired.</p>
<p>His obviously was.</p>
<p>BROWNSTOWN TOWNSHIP, Michigan — A suburban Detroit man <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/alcohol-impairs-your-judgment/">[Continue Reading Alcohol Impairs Your Judgment...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/alcohol-impairs-your-judgment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Francisco Offers to be Re-Inspected in Wake of DNA Scandal</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/san-francisco-offers-to-be-re-inspected-in-wake-of-dna-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/san-francisco-offers-to-be-re-inspected-in-wake-of-dna-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 03:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Greg Suhr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exculpatory evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Crime Lab]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/san-francisco-offers-to-be-re-inspected-in-wake-of-dna-scandal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>So after ASCLD-LAB failed to find the errors in the San Francisco DNA crime lab in the 2010 accreditation cycle, the new chief proposes a re-inspection by the same association will increase the public’s faith in the lab?</p>
<p>There ARE other accreditation bodies. Maybe ASCLD-LAB isn’t doing that great of a job? We keep <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/san-francisco-offers-to-be-re-inspected-in-wake-of-dna-scandal/">[Continue Reading San Francisco Offers to be Re-Inspected in Wake of DNA Scandal...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/san-francisco-offers-to-be-re-inspected-in-wake-of-dna-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Drug Charges for Former SFPD Crime Lab Supervisor</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/federal-drug-charges-for-former-sfpd-crime-lab-supervisor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/federal-drug-charges-for-former-sfpd-crime-lab-supervisor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deborah Madden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal drug charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Police Crime Lab]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/federal-drug-charges-for-former-sfpd-crime-lab-supervisor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>In an interesting turn of events former San Francisco criminalist, Deborah Madden, has been brought up on federal charges, even after the state opted to not press charges (SFGate).</p>
<p>Apparently there is a limit to what even government employees can get away with, in that crazy San Francisco.</p>
<p>Madden, 61, who has not been jailed <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/federal-drug-charges-for-former-sfpd-crime-lab-supervisor/">[Continue Reading Federal Drug Charges for Former SFPD Crime Lab Supervisor...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/federal-drug-charges-for-former-sfpd-crime-lab-supervisor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seriously TSA?</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/seriously-tsa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/seriously-tsa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 02:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun purse design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teen purse gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/seriously-tsa/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Seriously? It’s an all to common expression nowadays, but apropos to this story.</p>
<p>A teen carrying a purse with a firearm DESIGN, was detained by the TSA at the airport.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Seriously?</p>
<p>What’s next? T-shirts that have images of firearms?</p>
<p>Vanessa Gibbs, 17, said officials with the Transportation Security Administration at Norfolk International Airport stopped her during a <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/seriously-tsa/">[Continue Reading Seriously TSA?...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/seriously-tsa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Attempt By the State to Shield Forensics From Cross-Examination</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/another-attempt-by-the-state-to-shield-forensics-from-cross-examination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/another-attempt-by-the-state-to-shield-forensics-from-cross-examination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 20:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confrontation clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melendez-diaz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sixth Ammendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/another-attempt-by-the-state-to-shield-forensics-from-cross-examination/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Another case to be heard by the US Supreme Court where the State doesn’t want their forensic science evidence questioned by the defense.</p>
<p>ON Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Williams v. Illinois, the latest in a string of cases addressing whether the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause — which gives the <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/another-attempt-by-the-state-to-shield-forensics-from-cross-examination/">[Continue Reading Another Attempt By the State to Shield Forensics From Cross-Examination...]</a></b></i></p>


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/melendez-diaz-v-massachusetts/' rel='bookmark' title='MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. MASSACHUSETTS'>MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. MASSACHUSETTS</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/another-attempt-by-the-state-to-shield-forensics-from-cross-examination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oakland County Crime Lab Wants to Start DNA Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/oakland-county-crime-lab-wants-to-start-dna-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/oakland-county-crime-lab-wants-to-start-dna-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit crime lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan State Police Crime Lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/oakland-county-crime-lab-wants-to-start-dna-testing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Oakland County Crime Lab has recently been ASCLD-LAB certified.  They claim that as a result they can apply for federal grants.  They could always apply, ASCLD-LAB doesn’t have control over federal grant money, yet.</p>
<p>The Michigan State Police Crime Lab is right to seemingly question “why?”</p>
<p>DNA, like trace analysis, is a discipline <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/oakland-county-crime-lab-wants-to-start-dna-testing/">[Continue Reading Oakland County Crime Lab Wants to Start DNA Testing...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/oakland-county-crime-lab-wants-to-start-dna-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fairness Needed In Forensic Labs</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/fairness-needed-in-forensic-labs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/fairness-needed-in-forensic-labs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Crime Lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/fairness-needed-in-forensic-labs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>When a lab has a policy to deliberately obfuscate the results of forensic examinations, in order to support the prosecution’s theory of the case, that’s gross institutional bias.</p>
<p>They aren’t even trying to pretend to be fair, impartial scientists.</p>
<p>It might be time to consider hiring new employees who haven’t been tainted with such unprofessional <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/fairness-needed-in-forensic-labs/">[Continue Reading Fairness Needed In Forensic Labs...]</a></b></i></p>


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/closing-ncsbi-might-be-only-reasonable-solution/' rel='bookmark' title='Closing NC:SBI Might Be Only Reasonable Solution'>Closing NC:SBI Might Be Only Reasonable Solution</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/blood-spatter-work-suspended-at-nc-sbi-2/' rel='bookmark' title='Blood Spatter Work Suspended at NC SBI'>Blood Spatter Work Suspended at NC SBI</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/local-reactions-to-the-sbi-lab-review/' rel='bookmark' title='Local Reactions to the SBI Lab Review'>Local Reactions to the SBI Lab Review</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/firearms-identification-work-at-sbi-under-question-as-well/' rel='bookmark' title='Firearms Identification Work at SBI Under Question As Well'>Firearms Identification Work at SBI Under Question As Well</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/fairness-needed-in-forensic-labs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>County Crime Lab Needed Help From Private Forensic Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/county-crime-lab-needed-help-from-private-forensic-lab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/county-crime-lab-needed-help-from-private-forensic-lab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santa Clara County Crime Lab]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/county-crime-lab-needed-help-from-private-forensic-lab/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Private labs are often needed to help perform specialty or quick turn-around time analysis.  Sometimes it’s more cost effective to pay an outside private lab to perform analysis, then to commit a significant portion of the crime lab staff for extended periods of time on a single case.</p>
<p>The DA’s office charged Nasmeh <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/county-crime-lab-needed-help-from-private-forensic-lab/">[Continue Reading County Crime Lab Needed Help From Private Forensic Lab...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/county-crime-lab-needed-help-from-private-forensic-lab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malaysian Crime Accreditation Failure on Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/malaysian-crime-accreditation-failure-on-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/malaysian-crime-accreditation-failure-on-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASCLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysian Crime Lab]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=2253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>While accreditation may be voluntary, if a lab attempts to be accredited and fails after having two extensions, that information should be made available to juries.</p>
<p>It let’s the juries know that the lab in question is not up to the standards of the accreditation body. It doesn’t necessarily mean the results are wrong, <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/malaysian-crime-accreditation-failure-on-trial/">[Continue Reading Malaysian Crime Accreditation Failure on Trial...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/malaysian-crime-accreditation-failure-on-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nassau County Crime Lab Woes Lead to New Trials</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/nassau-county-crime-lab-woes-lead-to-new-trials/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/nassau-county-crime-lab-woes-lead-to-new-trials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lab errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nassau County]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/nassau-county-crime-lab-woes-lead-to-new-trials/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Criminal defense attorneys are well aware it’s crucial in a forensic laboratory for proper protocols to be followed.  Analysts are also being held accountable for their work product.  Gone are the days of sheltering analysts from cross-examination by having a more senior employee testify on their behalf.</p>
<p>Problems of these types are <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/nassau-county-crime-lab-woes-lead-to-new-trials/">[Continue Reading Nassau County Crime Lab Woes Lead to New Trials...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/nassau-county-crime-lab-woes-lead-to-new-trials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Houston Leaders Want Crime Lab Out Of Police Department</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/houston-leaders-want-crime-lab-out-of-police-department/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/houston-leaders-want-crime-lab-out-of-police-department/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston PD crime lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/houston-leaders-want-crime-lab-out-of-police-department/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Houston PD Crime Lab, an oh too common topic on this website, is under the cross-hairs of it’s own city council.  They are looking to yank the crime lab out of the police department because police chiefs aren’t scientists and not qualified to run a laboratory — good point!</p>
<p>The Houston Police Department’s <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/houston-leaders-want-crime-lab-out-of-police-department/">[Continue Reading Houston Leaders Want Crime Lab Out Of Police Department...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/houston-leaders-want-crime-lab-out-of-police-department/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nomenclature: Centerfire Ammunition</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/nomenclature-centerfire-ammunition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/nomenclature-centerfire-ammunition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forensics 101]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nomenclature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/nomenclature-centerfire-ammunition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Depending on popularity, I am starting a series of educational posts related to forensic science.  I am modeling this series of posts on common testimony I have to give a jury, so that everyone is on the same page before we get to the meat of the case.</p>
<p>First thing.  This is <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/nomenclature-centerfire-ammunition/">[Continue Reading Nomenclature: Centerfire Ammunition...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/nomenclature-centerfire-ammunition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forensics Guy Joins Google+</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/forensics-guy-joins-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/forensics-guy-joins-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google+]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/forensics-guy-joins-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Upgraded to Google+?</p>
<p>Follow us there:</p>
<p>http://gplus.to/ForensicsGuy</p>
<p>If you are a regular reader, contact us if you need a Google+ invite.</p>


<p>No <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/forensics-guy-joins-google/">[Continue Reading Forensics Guy Joins Google+...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/forensics-guy-joins-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CODIS Wont Accept DNA Samples From Connecticut Crime Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/codis-wont-accept-dna-samples-from-connecticut-crime-lab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/codis-wont-accept-dna-samples-from-connecticut-crime-lab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CODIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Crime Lab]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/codis-wont-accept-dna-samples-from-connecticut-crime-lab/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>After losing their accreditation, the FBI will no longer accept DNA samples data into CODIS.</p>
<p>There is more fallout from the lack of accreditation for the state police forensic lab: The federal DNA data bank is not accepting new Connecticut DNA samples from convicted offenders.</p>
<p>Michael P. Lawlor, chief of criminal justice policy and planning <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/codis-wont-accept-dna-samples-from-connecticut-crime-lab/">[Continue Reading CODIS Wont Accept DNA Samples From Connecticut Crime Lab...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/codis-wont-accept-dna-samples-from-connecticut-crime-lab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Elite Accreditation”???</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/elite-accreditation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/elite-accreditation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASCLD-LAB ISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elite accreditation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland State Police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/elite-accreditation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>What is this “new elite accreditation” the article writes about?  It’s actually just the new version of ASCLD-LAB accreditation.  It’s based on an ISO standard.  The old accreditation is no longer offered, so the article seems very pro-lab biased.</p>
<p>The Maryland State Police crime lab in Pikesville has received an elite <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/elite-accreditation/">[Continue Reading “Elite Accreditation”???...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/elite-accreditation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Crime Lab Loses ASCLD-LAB Accreditation</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/state-crime-lab-loses-ascld-lab-accreditation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/state-crime-lab-loses-ascld-lab-accreditation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut State Crime Lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lost accreditation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/state-crime-lab-loses-ascld-lab-accreditation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>It’s not often a lab loses accreditation.  Anyone know what the findings were that caused this?</p>
<p>Connecticut’s embattled top forensics lab has lost its accreditation but state officials vow to press for its recertification at the earliest possible date.
The American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors Laboratory Accreditation Board declined to extend the Division <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/state-crime-lab-loses-ascld-lab-accreditation/">[Continue Reading State Crime Lab Loses ASCLD-LAB Accreditation...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/state-crime-lab-loses-ascld-lab-accreditation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man Shoots Self In Penis with Girlfriend’s Pink Gun</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/man-shoots-self-in-penis-with-girlfriends-pink-gun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/man-shoots-self-in-penis-with-girlfriends-pink-gun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holster carry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joshua Seto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shot penis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/man-shoots-self-in-penis-with-girlfriends-pink-gun/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>This isn’t the first time I’ve heard of some guy shooting himself in his penis.</p>
<p>I had a case with some rather disturbing photos I had to review.</p>
<p>What makes this case especially sad was the fact it was with a pink gun.  No bragging rights to his buddies here.</p>
<p>Please guys, carry in a <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/man-shoots-self-in-penis-with-girlfriends-pink-gun/">[Continue Reading Man Shoots Self In Penis with Girlfriend’s Pink Gun...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/man-shoots-self-in-penis-with-girlfriends-pink-gun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Houston PD Crime Lab Supervisor Testifies Breath Tests Not Reliable</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/houston-pd-crime-lab-supervisor-testifies-breath-tests-not-reliable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/houston-pd-crime-lab-supervisor-testifies-breath-tests-not-reliable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breath alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breath test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/houston-pd-crime-lab-supervisor-testifies-breath-tests-not-reliable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>If multiple police scientists and a supervisor (now working to oversee breath testers) don’t believe breath results are reliable, why is the prosecution even moving forward with cases?</p>
<p>
A former HPD crime lab supervisor testified today that she and two other scientists quit because they could not trust the integrity of results from several <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/houston-pd-crime-lab-supervisor-testifies-breath-tests-not-reliable/">[Continue Reading Houston PD Crime Lab Supervisor Testifies Breath Tests Not Reliable...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/houston-pd-crime-lab-supervisor-testifies-breath-tests-not-reliable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Las Vegas Crime Lab Analyst Makes Repeated Mistakes with DNA Evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/las-vegas-crime-lab-analyst-makes-repeated-mistakes-with-dna-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/las-vegas-crime-lab-analyst-makes-repeated-mistakes-with-dna-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas Crime Lab]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=2159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>What’s amazing about this article isn’t the fact that errors were made.  Humans make mistakes.  It’s the people who should have caught the errors who didn’t:</p>
<p>1) The analyst
2) The lab during either technical or administrative review of the casework
3) The defense team
4) The independent expert hired by the defense team to <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/las-vegas-crime-lab-analyst-makes-repeated-mistakes-with-dna-evidence/">[Continue Reading Las Vegas Crime Lab Analyst Makes Repeated Mistakes with DNA Evidence...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/las-vegas-crime-lab-analyst-makes-repeated-mistakes-with-dna-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Forensic Science Exemption to US Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/no-forensic-science-exemption-to-us-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/no-forensic-science-exemption-to-us-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullcoming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullcoming v. New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melendez-diaz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/no-forensic-science-exemption-to-us-constitution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>In a 5–4 non-partisan ruling, the United States Supreme Court further clarified the defendant’s right to confront their accuser in criminal cases.</p>
<p>Where Melendez-Diaz ruled the prosecution could not simply submit a crime laboratory report as evidence, June 23, 2011’s ruling in Bullcoming v. New Mexico further explains the courts decision to uphold the <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/no-forensic-science-exemption-to-us-constitution/">[Continue Reading No Forensic Science Exemption to US Constitution...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/no-forensic-science-exemption-to-us-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alabama Department of Forensic Sciences to Close Three Labs</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/alabama-department-of-forensic-sciences-to-close-three-labs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/alabama-department-of-forensic-sciences-to-close-three-labs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama Department of Forensic Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lab closing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/alabama-department-of-forensic-sciences-to-close-three-labs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>It’s a pity that budget problems are forcing three of Alabama’s State crime labs to close.  A few years ago I had the opportunity to help setup and later train the users at the McClellan and Dothan labs in a new forensic software application they were implementing statewide.</p>
<p>McClellan had a great system <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/alabama-department-of-forensic-sciences-to-close-three-labs/">[Continue Reading Alabama Department of Forensic Sciences to Close Three Labs...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/alabama-department-of-forensic-sciences-to-close-three-labs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military Court Tells Jury to Disregard Forensic Evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/military-court-tells-jury-to-disregard-forensic-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/military-court-tells-jury-to-disregard-forensic-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fingerprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latent print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/military-court-tells-jury-to-disregard-forensic-evidence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>The issue in this case isn’t that the analyst “failed to identify a fingerprint”. The issue is that the government failed to disclose this information which goes to show the reliability of the analyst in the case.</p>
<p>To be clear, failure to identify a print isn’t the same thing as making a false-positive match, <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/military-court-tells-jury-to-disregard-forensic-evidence/">[Continue Reading Military Court Tells Jury to Disregard Forensic Evidence...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/military-court-tells-jury-to-disregard-forensic-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/feed/ ) in 2.40096 seconds, on May 18th, 2012 at 1:35 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 18th, 2012 at 2:35 pm UTC -->
