No related posts.

Math Error Inflates DUI Results

We’ve seen it before, human error caus­ing peo­ple to be charged with crimes they didn’t com­mit. In this case being falsely charged with DUI.

The guar­an­teed response from the lab is “there is noth­ing wrong with the sci­ence”. The prob­lem is that sci­ence doesn’t exist in a vac­uum. The humans involved always has an effect on the sci­en­tific results. It’s all related to the Heisenberg uncer­tainty prin­ci­ple.

We saw another human error inflate blood alco­hol results in Colorado not too long ago, lead­ing to false con­vic­tions. This is why it’s impor­tant to always hire an expe­ri­enced DUI attor­ney, and have a qual­i­fied expert review your case materials.

Lab sci­en­tists’ math­e­mat­i­cal errors at the Anoka County Sheriff’s Office Tri-County Regional Crime Lab resulted in inflated blood alco­hol con­cen­tra­tion (BAC) lev­els in 111 driving-while-impaired cases in the three coun­ties the lab services.

The regional crime lab, which started ana­lyz­ing urine sam­ples in DWI cases Jan. 1, ser­vices Anoka, Sherburne and Wright counties.

According to Lt. Paul Sommer, the Anoka County Sheriff’s Office spokesper­son, the error was math­e­mat­i­cal and applied only to urine sam­ples, not the blood tests.

According to Sommer, lab sci­en­tists are sup­posed to mul­ti­ply the end result by 0.67 to deter­mine the grams of alco­hol per 67 mil­li­liters of urine. The mul­ti­pli­ca­tion was not done, so the end result reported the grams of alco­hol per 100 mil­li­liters of urine, there­fore inflat­ing the results.

“The sci­ence was not bad. Nothing was tainted. It was a human error,” Sommer said.

Read much more on StarNews.com.

Share

No related posts.

You must be logged in to post a comment.