Related posts:

  1. The Reverse CSI Effect
  2. Yet Another Article About the CSI Effect
  3. An Irish take on the “CSI Effect”
  4. Professor Bob Shaler on Forensic Science

Nebraska on the CSI Effect

Glamorization has always been my biggest com­plaint about the pop­u­lar­iza­tion of foren­sics on TV. Not that peo­ple think evi­dence can be processed in a man­ner of min­utes, with a big flash­ing “MATCH” sign on the com­puter with a pic­ture of the sus­pect, their social secu­rity num­ber, and their cur­rent loca­tion grabbed from the GPS chip in their cell phone, or even that one per­son can lit­er­ally do EVERY test in the laboratory.

What gets me is that kids watch­ing these shows think every­one work­ing in a crime lab is “model pretty”, and they all get to wear badges and guns and go out and col­lect evi­dence, inter­view sus­pects, and act as psy­chi­a­trists to griev­ing fam­ily mem­bers. Up until the past few years, the crime lab has usu­ally been an after­thought in most police agen­cies, with the lab being placed in an old nasty base­ment, with leaky walls, asbestos falling from the ceil­ing tiles, and the ana­lysts only acknowl­edged by police brass when there was a screw-up, and some­one needed to take the blame.

They pre­tend to do on T.V. what Cammi Strong does for a living.

“I’ll be sit­ting there going okay that’s not how it works. That’s not how it really hap­pens,” said Cammi Strong, a D.N.A. analyst.

Strong never goes to the crime scene. Police send her their evidence.

The fol­low­ing in an inter­est­ing def­i­n­i­tion of the “CSI Effect”. I always thought it was the demand of juries to expect DNA, fin­ger­prints, and all other kinds of pos­si­ble foren­sic tests per­formed on each piece of evi­dence, or the jury goes “not guilty” because the state didn’t do every­thing they could to “prove” the defen­dant was guilty.

CSI, NCIS and Law & Order… the list of crime dra­mas on T.V. nowa­days goes on and on. On those shows, crimes hap­pen and get solved within the same hour. Law enforce­ment says the shows have tainted pub­lic per­cep­tion and have dubbed the sit­u­a­tion the “CSI effect.”

This is my favorite quote of the whole arti­cle. To sug­gest that TV shows are “teach­ing” crim­i­nals how to not get caught, then to go on to specif­i­cally tell crim­i­nals how they are still mess­ing up. Incredible!

Local law enforce­ment said shows are teach­ing crim­i­nals how to cover their tracks. But, they still man­age to slip up like leav­ing the gloves they wore to mask their fin­ger­prints behind at the crime scene.

Read the entire Nebraska.TV arti­cle here.

Share

Related posts:

  1. The Reverse CSI Effect
  2. Yet Another Article About the CSI Effect
  3. An Irish take on the “CSI Effect”
  4. Professor Bob Shaler on Forensic Science

You must be logged in to post a comment.