Police: DNA Swab Cracked Baseline Killer Case


I prob­a­bly know most of the play­ers on the Phoenix Police/Lab parts of this arti­cle. I tend to believe what Commander Miiler is saying.

Original arti­cle posted here.

POSTED: 12:23 pm MST November 11, 2008
UPDATED: 1:02 pm MST November 11, 2008
PHOENIX — Phoenix police detec­tives had evi­dence that could have helped them iden­tify accused “Baseline Killer” Mark Goudeau nine months before his arrest, an inves­ti­ga­tor who worked on the case said.

Goudeau is accused of nine slay­ings and more than a dozen rapes and kidnappings.

The main piece of evi­dence Phoenix police used to arrest Goudeau in early September 2006 was DNA found at the scene of a double-rape.

In September 2005, two sis­ters were raped in South Phoenix, and police col­lected two swabs of evi­dence from the breasts of one of the women, hop­ing the rapist’s DNA could be detected.

An inves­ti­ga­tor on that case said a spe­cial­ist in the Phoenix police crime lab did a full DNA analy­sis on only one of the two swabs, and the test did not give inves­ti­ga­tors a suspect.

The inves­ti­ga­tor said his supe­ri­ors told him the other swab was lost.

Over the next seven months, seven peo­ple were slain by the man pop­u­larly known as the “Baseline Killer.”

After the ninth slay­ing, which occurred in June 2006, Phoenix police decided to ask the Arizona Department of Public Safety for help, an inves­ti­ga­tor said at the time.

Among the evi­dence DPS tested in its crime lab were both of the swabs taken from the sex­ual assault nine months earlier.

DPS ana­lyzed the DNA on the sec­ond swab, and matched it to that of Goudeau, who was later arrested, charged and con­victed of the double-rape.

Billy Coleman of the Phoenix Law Enforcement Association said he con­fronted his supe­ri­ors about miss­ing evidence.

“It is such a sad state­ment, but when I con­fronted a com­man­der about this — about items of evi­dence not tested that could have saved vic­tims — I was told we were for­tu­nate that we lost that evi­dence before we sent it out because we would have con­sumed it and not had it,” Coleman said.

Coleman would not say which case he was refer­ring to, but a source in the Phoenix Police Department con­firmed it was the Baseline Killer case.

When asked about the evi­dence, a Phoenix police pub­lic infor­ma­tion offi­cer offered a writ­ten state­ment explain­ing why the depart­ment turned to DPS for help.

According to the state­ment, police turned evi­dence over to the DPS lab to use DPS’ more advanced DNA analy­sis technology.

The tech­nol­ogy, known as Y-STR DNA test­ing, is a more accu­rate way of test­ing men’s DNA.

DPS Lab Superintendent Todd Griffith said with­out Y-STR tech­nol­ogy, it would have been dif­fi­cult to find a suspect.

The DPS lab first started using the tech­nol­ogy in April 2005 — months before the rapes, rob­beries and slay­ings attrib­uted to the Baseline Killer.

Nevertheless, Phoenix police Cmdr. Chuck Miiler said the case is not so simple.

“There is so much infor­ma­tion involved (that) it’s not fac­tual to just say, ‘Hey, seven addi­tional homi­cides occurred, and they could have been pre­vented,’” Miiler said. “It’s just not truth­ful in that light; there’s just so many mov­ing parts to this com­plex case.”

You must be logged in to post a comment.