<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popular Mechanics on Forensics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/popular-mechanics-on-forensics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/popular-mechanics-on-forensics/</link>
	<description>and Opinion by a Real Forensic Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:23:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Defense &#8220;Expert&#8221; and Forensic Firearms Skeptic Not Allowed to Testify &#124; Bench Notes: Forensic Science News</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/popular-mechanics-on-forensics/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Defense &#8220;Expert&#8221; and Forensic Firearms Skeptic Not Allowed to Testify &#124; Bench Notes: Forensic Science News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=441#comment-235</guid>
		<description>[...] a problem with the &#8220;academia&#8221; criticizing the field of forensic science. (Just read my thoughts on the recent Popular Mechanics article where the academics try to shoot down forensic scie....) Constructive criticism is always appreciated, but complaints and attacks by people with no actual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] a problem with the “academia” criticizing the field of forensic science. (Just read my thoughts on the recent Popular Mechanics article where the academics try to shoot down forensic scie.…) Constructive criticism is always appreciated, but complaints and attacks by people with no actual […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitemark Experts Agree, Bitemark Evidence Isn&#8217;t Reliable &#124; Bench Notes: Forensic Science News</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/popular-mechanics-on-forensics/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitemark Experts Agree, Bitemark Evidence Isn&#8217;t Reliable &#124; Bench Notes: Forensic Science News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=441#comment-233</guid>
		<description>[...] evidence has been questioned in this blog before, specifically in an article by Popular Mechanics related to the NAS report, and the article on recent congressional [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] evidence has been questioned in this blog before, specifically in an article by Popular Mechanics related to the NAS report, and the article on recent congressional […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Bob Shaler on Forensic Science &#124; Bench Notes: Forensic Science News</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/popular-mechanics-on-forensics/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Bob Shaler on Forensic Science &#124; Bench Notes: Forensic Science News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=441#comment-225</guid>
		<description>[...] in forensic testimony aren&#8217;t what the scientist testified to, but rather how the lawyers misrepresented the scientists statements later in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] in forensic testimony aren’t what the scientist testified to, but rather how the lawyers misrepresented the scientists statements later in the […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
