<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popular Mechanics on Forensics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/popular-mechanics-on-forensics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/popular-mechanics-on-forensics/</link>
	<description>and Opinion by a Real Forensic Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 01:26:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: cloa513</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/popular-mechanics-on-forensics/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>cloa513</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 05:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=441#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Given a lawyers follow a process with not more than an ounce of scientific process. The Law doesn&#039;t follow a process designed to send only the guilty to jail and release the innocent with the minimum cost- almost the completely the opposite. The whole area of witnesses is full of flaws as many pschology experiments have demonstrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given a lawyers follow a process with not more than an ounce of scientific process. The Law doesn’t follow a process designed to send only the guilty to jail and release the innocent with the minimum cost– almost the completely the opposite. The whole area of witnesses is full of flaws as many pschology experiments have demonstrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defense &#8220;Expert&#8221; and Forensic Firearms Skeptic Not Allowed to Testify &#124; Bench Notes: Forensic Science News</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/popular-mechanics-on-forensics/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Defense &#8220;Expert&#8221; and Forensic Firearms Skeptic Not Allowed to Testify &#124; Bench Notes: Forensic Science News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=441#comment-235</guid>
		<description>[...] a problem with the &#8220;academia&#8221; criticizing the field of forensic science. (Just read my thoughts on the recent Popular Mechanics article where the academics try to shoot down forensic scie....) Constructive criticism is always appreciated, but complaints and attacks by people with no actual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] a problem with the “academia” criticizing the field of forensic science. (Just read my thoughts on the recent Popular Mechanics article where the academics try to shoot down forensic scie.…) Constructive criticism is always appreciated, but complaints and attacks by people with no actual […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitemark Experts Agree, Bitemark Evidence Isn&#8217;t Reliable &#124; Bench Notes: Forensic Science News</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/popular-mechanics-on-forensics/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitemark Experts Agree, Bitemark Evidence Isn&#8217;t Reliable &#124; Bench Notes: Forensic Science News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=441#comment-233</guid>
		<description>[...] evidence has been questioned in this blog before, specifically in an article by Popular Mechanics related to the NAS report, and the article on recent congressional [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] evidence has been questioned in this blog before, specifically in an article by Popular Mechanics related to the NAS report, and the article on recent congressional […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Bob Shaler on Forensic Science &#124; Bench Notes: Forensic Science News</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/popular-mechanics-on-forensics/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Bob Shaler on Forensic Science &#124; Bench Notes: Forensic Science News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=441#comment-225</guid>
		<description>[...] in forensic testimony aren&#8217;t what the scientist testified to, but rather how the lawyers misrepresented the scientists statements later in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] in forensic testimony aren’t what the scientist testified to, but rather how the lawyers misrepresented the scientists statements later in the […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/popular-mechanics-on-forensics/feed/ ) in 0.97594 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 7:33 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 8:33 pm UTC -->
