Imagine prosecutors and criminal defense attorneys being able to virtually walk a jury around a crime scene, so demonstrate their case. Seems that a North Carolina Sheriff’s Department is getting their hands on technology capable of doing just that.
The Iredell County commissioners had a diverse array of matters come before them for action at their first board meeting of the new year Tuesday night.
The commissioners approved a request by the Iredell County Sheriff’s Office to purchase what is known as a 3-D scene digitizer for the county’s crime lab.
Chief Deputy Rick Dowdle told the commissioners that the $51,200 piece of equipment will help expedite crime scene investigations.
“It will help us get in and get out,” Dowdle said, and explained that the device would also be helpful during criminal trials.
“It will give juries a virtual tour of the crime scene,” he said.
The digitizer will be purchased with federal equity sharing funds, which largely derives from cash seized during drug busts.
Read the whole Moorseville Tribune article here.
If this is the same type of system I saw demonstrated (Leica Geosystems Scanstation 2) that was in use at the Albuquerque New Mexico Police Department Crime Lab, the system can do a lot more than simply present jurors with a virtual walk through of the crime scene. They also allow for measuring of distances and angles at later dates.
What this means is that the crime scene technician can take two or three scans of the crime scene, and then further information can be obtained from the scene, even after all police employees have left. Days/weeks/months/years later. Forgot to measure how high off the ground the bullet strike was? No problem, load up the crime scene scan file, take the measurement in a matter of seconds.
Generally 3D scanning is quicker to do than other types of crime scene documentation, and it provides a lot more useful data. This extra data will make crime scene reconstruction all that much more accurate, reliable, and easier to explain to a jury.
The drawback of course is expense. It costs more than a pad of paper and a few pencils. In this case though, it seems to be an excellent use of seized money, that otherwise probably could not be rolled into the local government’s “general funds.”
Related posts:
A bit of discrepancy I heard from the new article that the device cost $140000 for APD (as against $51200 for the item of equipment ) but could include training, extra computer storage capacity, display for court house.