<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FSN: Forensic Science News &#187; bullet lead analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/tag/bullet-lead-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes</link>
	<description>and Opinion by a Real Forensic Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oregon case puts reliability of science itself on trial</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/oregon-case-puts-reliability-of-science-itself-on-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/oregon-case-puts-reliability-of-science-itself-on-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullet lead analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>This is a follow-up story to “Bullet Lead Analysis Case Convictions Under Fire”</p>
<p>The following article was originally posted here.</p>
<p>As technology changes, new techniques will give more reliable results than old one.  It’s the way of technology, and forensic science is no different.</p>
<p>What forensic scientists need to be careful of misrepresenting the meaning <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/oregon-case-puts-reliability-of-science-itself-on-trial/">[Continue Reading Oregon case puts reliability of science itself on trial...]</a></b></i></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/oregon-case-puts-reliability-of-science-itself-on-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullet Lead Analysis Case Convictions Under Fire</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/bullet-lead-analysis-case-convictions-under-fire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/bullet-lead-analysis-case-convictions-under-fire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullet lead analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>digg_url = 'http://digg.com/general_sciences/Discredited_forensics_may_upend_rulings#';</p>
<p>Forensic science is often asked to perform certain types of testing.  The testing can be performed in an appropriate manner, and results that are obtained can be valid.  It’s what happens once the results of testing are explained to the jury, and how significant those results are, that is <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/bullet-lead-analysis-case-convictions-under-fire/">[Continue Reading Bullet Lead Analysis Case Convictions Under Fire...]</a></b></i></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/bullet-lead-analysis-case-convictions-under-fire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
