<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FSN: Forensic Science News &#187; federal evidence rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/tag/federal-evidence-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes</link>
	<description>and Opinion by a Real Forensic Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:20:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Daubert Hearing Only Needed for Novel Challenges</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/daubert-hearing-only-needed-for-novel-challenges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/daubert-hearing-only-needed-for-novel-challenges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daubert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daubert challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal evidence rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/?p=1099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Finally some sense interjected into the criminal justice system, as it relates to expert witness testimony.</p>
<p>Fifth Circuit holds that “absent novel challenges, fingerprint evidence is sufficiently reliable to satisfy Rule 702 and Daubert,”  and a Daubert hearing is not necessarily required, in United States v. John, _ F.3d. _ (5th Cir. Feb. <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/daubert-hearing-only-needed-for-novel-challenges/">[Continue Reading Daubert Hearing Only Needed for Novel Challenges...]</a></b></i></p>


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/daubert-hearing-only-needed-for-novel-challenges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/tag/federal-evidence-rules/feed/ ) in 2.30083 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 7:25 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 8:25 pm UTC -->
