<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FSN: Forensic Science News &#187; forensic odontology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/tag/forensic-odontology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes</link>
	<description>and Opinion by a Real Forensic Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:04:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bitemark Experts Agree, Bitemark Evidence Isn’t Reliable</title>
		<link>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/bitemark-evidence-reliability-nas-report-university-buffalo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/bitemark-evidence-reliability-nas-report-university-buffalo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forensics Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bite marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensic odontology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAS report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/2009/660/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI-FSN —  <p>Admittedly that’s a bit over an overstatement for a article title, but it gets the readers attention.  A recent study at the University of Buffalo have concluded that bitemark evidence can’t be linked back to a given individual.  Bitemark evidence can certainly be used to exclude and include a suspect, but <p><b><i><a href="http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/bitemark-evidence-reliability-nas-report-university-buffalo/">[Continue Reading Bitemark Experts Agree, Bitemark Evidence Isn’t Reliable...]</a></b></i></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forensicsguy.com/benchnotes/bitemark-evidence-reliability-nas-report-university-buffalo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
