No related posts.

Tax Dollars Spent Wisely on Forensics?

I’ve been to the LAPD-LASD crime lab­o­ra­tory and it’s a fan­tas­tic facil­ity. Certainly tax dol­lars spent to inves­ti­gate crimes, and poten­tially get vio­lent offend­ers off the streets before they can com­mit addi­tional vic­tims, is an excel­lent plan.

The ques­tion is are drop­ping more and more tax dol­lars into police con­trolled crime labs the most effi­cient way to accom­plish these tasks. There is a law of dimin­ish­ing returns in eco­nom­ics. As gov­ern­ment police labs grow larger and larger, they get bur­dened with over­head and non-case work­ing staff, the amount of cases worked per tax dol­lar spent declines.

Also as indi­cated in the recent NAS (National Academy of Science) report on foren­sics, there appears to be an insti­tu­tional bias in some police crime labs. Wouldn’t the pub­lic be served bet­ter if their tax dol­lars were spent on smaller, per­haps pri­vate, labs that are more effi­cient in their case work, spend­ing less money on required lay­ers of gov­ern­ment bureaucracy?

I don’t know that this is the case at either LAPD or LASD crime labs, but in today’s trou­bled econ­omy, espe­cially trou­bled California, it might be time to start think­ing out­side the box, and find­ing bet­ter, more effi­cient ways to spend tax dollars.

Original arti­cle posted here:

For thou­sands of rape vic­tims and their fam­i­lies, their anguish was com­pounded recently when Sheriff Lee Baca announced he no longer had the staff nor the dol­lars to exam­ine DNA evi­dence of open cases.

Frustrating for vic­tims, yes. Worse, scary for the county pop­u­la­tion know­ing that the bud­getary snafu meant rapists and other sex­ual offend­ers would remain out there, free to com­mit more crimes and never to feel the cold steel of police hand­cuffs on their wrists nor see the inside of a courtroom.

Then, last week, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Pasadena, said he was able to fun­nel $1 mil­lion in fed­eral stim­u­lus money to help the sher­iff and the Los Angeles Police Department — which share a crime lab — tackle the thou­sands of sex­ual assault kits that remain unopened.

The sheriff’s depart­ment reported last month that it had 4,000 rape kits sit­ting in ware­houses, and that was after the sher­iff had launched an effort to reduce the back­log back in November.

The money — a pru­dent use of fed­eral dol­lars and one that will cre­ate jobs as well as restart the wheels of jus­tice — will go to Cal State Los Angeles, which over­sees the 2-year-old, on-campus, joint LAPD-LASD crime lab through the California Forensic Science Institute.

The uni­ver­sity and the lab will use the dol­lars, sched­uled to arrive in September, to out­source about 250 of the highest-priority cases to pri­vate, accred­ited labs. Also, four grad­u­ate assis­tants study­ing crim­i­nal­is­tics at CSULA will be hired to sort through the legal cases and untan­gle the red tape asso­ci­ated with each cold case. Currently, crim­i­nol­o­gists with the LAPD and LASD are mak­ing these phone calls and read­ing through these files, when their exper­tise can be bet­ter used ana­lyz­ing the DNA sam­ples them­selves. Last, CSULA pro­fes­sors will be given time to research new and faster ways to ana­lyze crime evi­dence and present their find­ings to the public.

Unlike an episode of “CSI,” even the rel­a­tively new crime lab on the CSULA cam­pus can’t turn around cases within a few min­utes. Some of the evi­dence is tainted with other bod­ily flu­ids or present other sci­en­tific chal­lenges which adds to the time it takes to com­plete an inves­ti­ga­tion. The trail on other cases have become so cold that ana­lyz­ing DNA data is not enough to bring a rapist to justice.

Hence, the joint agency crime lab, which itself took years to build and staff, is not the end of the line for fam­i­lies and vic­tims await­ing jus­tice. The back­log that has been built up must be addressed quickly, before the assailant strikes again. Even the $1 mil­lion is not enough to do so — that will take another $3 mil­lion or $4 mil­lion, experts estimate.

Money spent on solv­ing crime cases is money well spent. More impor­tantly, our jus­tice sys­tem can’t be let to rot while the state suf­fers through a deep reces­sion. The coun­try is built on a work­ing crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem. That takes money, peo­ple, equip­ment, train­ing, etc. But as long as this money is spent wisely and not wasted, that is tax dol­lars that are well spent. Something we believe will be the case come September at the CSULA crime lab.

Share

No related posts.

You must be logged in to post a comment.